SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Broken_Clock who wrote (104855)8/2/2006 9:49:38 PM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (3) of 132070
 
Brent Scowcroft just presented a very pragmatic solution:

washingtonpost.com

It's crucial to note 4 things:

1. The Palestinians, Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, etc. have endorsed this plan continuously since 1976.
2. This gives Israel 3/4 of the land, Palestine 1/4 of the land. The populations are about equal and the Palestinians were there first. Thus, it is a demonstrably generous offer coming from the Palestinians.
3. Aside from Palestinian statehood, this is all simply a matter of enforcing international law (various UN resolutions). Also, Israel committed to this solution in writing when they signed the Camp David Accords in 1977.
4. Israel has steadfastly refused to accept this solution. As far as I now, their only acknowledgement of its existence is when they bombed Lebanon in 1976 as the PLO presented the plan to the UN and when they sent fighter jets over Saudi oil fields when the Saudi Prince presented the plan to the UN in 1981.

One final note: Putting moral issues aside, it's unequivocally in America's interest to execute this plan. This would DRAMATICALLY increase our leverage in the Middle East, and massively undercut those who oppose our interests.

Tom
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext