Mr FakeDija proudly says:
>>since I (unlike the bashers) believe in answering all legitimate questions.
-pig responded:
<<Who decides what is legitimate and what is not?>>
--Thank you. I AM proud of the fact that I debate fairly, and answer questions honestly, even though they may weaken my anti-basher case.
The same cannot be said for the bashers, which weakens their case in the eyes of anyone who is paying attention. For example, YOU did not answer my question to wit: Has brinker been WRONG to remain bullish since March 2003?
You criticized him for being bullish, saying to be bearish would hurt his sales. This is INSANE, since he has obviosly been correct to remain bullish.
He continued to say:
>>OK. I hope I have laid to rest the ridiculous charge that I am a shill.
pig responded:
<<Could you direct me to that post? ;---)>>
--You're kidding, obviously, but I fail to see the humor.
He also said:
>>Obviously, he should have sold out at some point. But he chose to just issue a "hold for future recovery" and hope for the best.
pig responded:
<<Now I have a legitimate question.
You say "Bob Brinker should have sold out". Yet, I have read numerous times how stupid people were that did not sell out on their own after it was "apparent" that Brinker was wrong. How dumb and ignorant those people were that held on, all the way to 18 or 19. How anyone with a brain should have know that it was a busted trade, and they are responsible for losing money.
After hearing all of that stuff for years, do you really think you can get away with ONLY saying he should have sold? Why isn't he as stupid, dumb and brainless as the people that followed his advice or lack of advice?>>
--I believe I just answered that question. |
