SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 159.42-1.2%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: engineer who wrote (54159)8/4/2006 11:45:05 AM
From: rkral  Read Replies (1) of 197246
 
re: "WCDMA requires about 3.2x more basestations than CDMA and GSM."

You put the reason for this on WCDMA's use of asynchronous base stations. But with a quick skim of Qualcomm's white paper "WCDMA Network Deployments: Asynchronous vs. Synchronous", I could not find any mention of a difference in base station density ... let alone such a significant difference.

If it's there, where did I miss it? If it's not there, why did Qualcomm not exploit such a golden PR opportunity?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News