SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dijaexyahoo who wrote (23122)8/5/2006 8:49:14 PM
From: stockalot  Read Replies (1) of 42834
 
Dija in apologizing for Brinker touting a stock in which he had an apparent conflict of interest and never disclosed it even though he had UTEK as his ONLY BUY during the greatest tech rally in history in which UTEK was in a tiny minority that failed to participate says:

"--Sometimes the simplest explanation is the best. You are weaving a tangled web. The more likely reason, imo,is that he was convinced by UTEK management that the stock was a good buy."

I agree that the simplest explanation is often best. But the simplest explanation here since Brinker NEVER once disclosed in his newsletter while touting UTEK as the only stock out of 6000 to buy in the late 90s--that UTEK was paying him--is that Brinker was touting UTEK BECAUSE they were the ONLY company paying him.

After all we have all seen that Brinker under his alias has been shown to be quite dishonest. We have seen that he is singularly focused on Brinker's bottom line. Ergo the "simplest explanation"--Brinker touted UTEK as the only buy cause they were the ONLY company paying him.

Btw that is the reason Yahoo UTEK thread began--by shills touting Brinker's appearance and insiders touting his worth and UTEK.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext