SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Nasdaq planning clampdown on Internet rumours
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe E. who wrote (231)9/24/1997 5:20:00 PM
From: Done, gone.   of 250
 
Joe E.

>> Sure, lets all sue each other. Good idea. <<

Bad idea. Good idea to sue selectively. A good selection is Pluvia v. Westergaard for one, 'cause Westergaard, from his commercial site, where the possibility of quid pro quo is nonexistent, made a public proclamation of a bounty on Pluvia, which must be answered in court, since nowhere else can intent to damage without recourse by victim be properly asessed.

Now, had the whole thing started and ended here on SI, in an open forum, well, you would not see me get excited. But public spats in public places, are not like private bounties broadcast by potentates.

Bounced Czech
(Go get'im Pluvia!)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News