Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (4195)	8/7/2006 9:42:08 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) of 224668

Clinton was fine on national security. Kerry would be even better. Eight years of peace and prosperity in the 90's, except Yugoslavia where Clinton and NATO took out Milosovic without a single US casualty. There was a growing problem with Al Qiada, but Clinton was on the ball there as well. Maybe not as much as he should have been (who knew how bad it would get?), but a lot more than Bush was. Bush did absolutely nothing against terrorist prior to 9-11, and may have even let that happen, at least by ignoring the warnings. Since then, after a good start in Afghanistan, Bush has done our military much more harm than all the terrorists in the world could ever do. That's just a fact. Clearly, Bush cannot be trusted with our military. He has proven that beyond any doubt.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next