Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 170.90

-1.3%

Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: slacker711 who wrote (54317)	8/9/2006 9:52:36 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (3) of 196558

Good points. Despite all the lawyerly procedural wrangling, the parties know reasonably well what their ultimate prospects are. Whenever I get a new case and have studied its basis, I can generally tell the parties what the result will be within reason. Sometimes I think of litigation as merely delaying the inevitable, as wrangling for tiny bits of advantage. Few suits really involve truly contested major points on which the parties are truly ignorant of the ultimate result. Juries of course add a tremendous amount of uncertainty to the process, but courts of appeal review crazy verdicts. In this case, tiny bits of advantage mean lots of dollars. Nokia is acting like it desperately wants every tiny bit of advantage possible. Because it probably needs it. I might be totally off on my assessment but these are merely a few intuitive thoughts based on 30 years of litigation experience. None of it at the global level at which Q and NOK are playing, so dose these thoughts with the appropriate level of NaCl.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next