Sioux Nation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation

DJT 13.90

-3.4%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (76092)	8/9/2006 4:56:15 PM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (3) of 362244

The trade center weight was carried by it's outer skin, not by a set of girders like that building in Spain. That is not at all true of WTC-7. WTC-7 was just a typical box style steel framed building with steel beams throughout. It was not the skeleton design that was used for towers 1 and 2. So, that explantion for WTC-7 collapse is not acceptable, because it is irrelevant. The fact is steel framed buildings like WTC-7 prior to and since 9/11/01 have NEVER collapsed due to fire and that is a 100% verifiable fact that people chose to ignore. What brought down WTC-7? It was not fires, they were not even hot enough to melt or deform steel, there was no jet fuel, the fires were limited and had not burned for long and infernoes that have lasted for over a day have not been able to bring down steel framed buildings prior to or since 9/11/01, so the whole idea of WTC-7 collapsing stinks to high heavens. It smells big time! It smells as bad as the CIA offices that were housed within WTC-7 and all the dastardly deeds orchestrated over the years from those same offices.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next