SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 152.43+0.1%2:34 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: benhorseman who wrote (53963)8/9/2006 5:22:07 PM
From: rkral  Read Replies (1) of 197439
 
Verizon’s EV-DO testing reportedly drains cell phone batteries in Florida, By Kelly Hill, Aug 8, 2006
rcrnews.com

SARASOTA, Fl.—Verizon Wireless’ testing of its high-speed CDMA2000 1x EV-DO service has reportedly been draining the batteries of some customers’ phones.
The Sarasota Herald-Tribune reported that users were finding the batteries in their EV-DO handsets were being drained more quickly than normal even when fully charged—sometimes as quickly as an hour or two.

“A lot of times I can’t finish a call. I go dead all the time just ’cause there’s no juice left,” Verizon Wireless subscriber Larry Ritt told the newspaper.

Verizon Wireless representatives could not be immediately reached for comment, but the Herald-Tribune indicated that the carrier had switched its EV-DO tests to night hours to lessen the potential impact. Verizon Wireless spokesman Chuck Hamby told the Herald-Tribune that the issue hadn’t occurred in other Florida market launches; EV-DO service should go live in Sarasota later this month.

In posts on the Internet, some cell phone enthusiasts recommend disabling EV-DO service on handsets in order to extend battery life.

!!!!!
Seems strange that Verizon's testing would drain batteries of subscribers that (apparently) aren't even "using" 1xEV-DO data.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext