SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation
DJT 14.40+2.8%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: James Calladine who wrote (76278)8/10/2006 3:49:04 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) of 362221
 
Once again,
If you actually want to understand the events you need to deal with each of the supposed anomolies, and examine them in detail. The analysis presented in "Debunking Popular Mechanics' 9/11 Lies" instead gives a whole laundry list of little factoids with a very superficial explanation of each one. This too is a logical fallacy known as proof by verbosity or "If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, then baffle them with your bullshit. "

Many of these factoids have been shown to be in error (such as the need for steel to melt to lose it's strength). The factoids however, are never removed from laundry list after they are debunked, which is in itself evidence that the purpose of the book is not to find the actual answer.

More importantly, these types of arguments assume that the conventional explanation for the collapse is impossible when in fact it is quite possible, and well documented on film.

TP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News