SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neeka who wrote (169180)8/10/2006 8:41:16 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) of 793800
 
Just WHAT does a UN resolution mean, really?

I think we all agree that the coalition allies didn't have a U.N. resolution or "permission" to invade Iraq.

Israel had a UN Resolution (1559) requiring the disarming of Hezbollah. Lot of good it did them, didn't it?

You jnow what? All this commotion won't matter at the end. What WILL matter is who won and who lost. Let's see that WE win.

Let me give an example: Alexander the Great didn't have a UN Resolution saying he could invade Turkey, Syria, Iran, Israel, ... He just did. And won. And now his lack of that resolution doesn't matter. What does matter is he won.

If the UN WON'T enforce its resolutions requiring positive action of some group, why should it expect respect respect for ANY of them? They are just meaningless hot air and paper.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext