SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Orcastraiter who wrote (13309)8/13/2006 8:26:31 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) of 20039
 
Perhaps you can back link to the post.
There must have been a full-moon this weekend because I went to Houston, came back and there is 2 or 3 hundred posts from the looney-bin here.

Going beyond the time, why is the speed of fall considered to be evidence of a bomb? Would a building that was blown up fall a bit slower because it's initial force was up?

I don't see what anyone is trying to prove with these timelines anyway. I saw in one article that it said "freefall" was a dramatic signature of demolition, but why wouldn't a building that fell because it's column broke on it's own not fall at the same speed as building whose column was expolded? It's it gravity that determines the speed?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext