SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (13322)8/14/2006 12:54:10 AM
From: Orcastraiter  Read Replies (1) of 20039
 
Just to take one example:, If WTC-1,2,&7 were rigged with explosives then there would have to be a reason that nobody saw them being installed (or there would have to be evidence that someone did see them installed). Either way it is part of a coherent story (perhaps story is a better word than plan since "plan" gets all caught up in motive and the like).


You didn't read the professors paper. He covered that aspect.

I'm sticking to the known facts. I've yet to see any official explanation of how the three buildings could have collapsed in near free fall time symmetrically into their own foot prints. In fact the question seems to have been avoided by FEMA and NIST.

What other theory besides demolition fits the facts? The details about how the charges could have set don't really matter. What matters is what could have possibly caused three buildings to collapse in that manner. We have to start there because that is where the facts begin. The other stuff is just detail as far as I am concerned.

If in fact the fires burning in the steel buildings did cause them to collapse in a few hours, then every steel building in America should be shut down until we know exactly what happened.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext