SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Earl who wrote (13531)8/16/2006 6:55:44 PM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (1) of 20039
 
You seem to be saying that you believe the heat source to be on the outside of the building...in the air where the molten material is pouring.

That is clearly not the case. The heat source for the material which is pouring OUT of the building would obviously be IN the building.

So, that material was removed from the heat source...by the fact that it was OUTSIDE the building.

It was red so it could not have been aluminum as you claim it may have been...otherwise it would have been silvery gray.

The fires in the building were not hot enough to melt steel so the heat source was NOT the fires. A different agent was working to melt metal in the towers.
The quantity of material pouring out, red hot, definitely suggests there was a lot of that meltable material in the towers.
Steel was in the towers, in great quantity.

C'mon Don...don't be so purposely dense.
There are no leaps to conclude that the flow originated from steel in the building and that an agent creating extreme heat was at work...melting the steel.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News