Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 138.87

+1.1%

Feb 9 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: voop who wrote (54608)	8/16/2006 10:32:41 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) of 197637

The belated part is interesting and perhaps the crux of the matter as the IPR and Nokia's liberal use of it seems no longer in question Naaah, the belated part is irrelevant. Q was not part of the GSM, GPRS, or EDGE standards groups. It wasn't obligated to disclose squat; NOK was instead obligated not to infringe. Disclosure was made but technically it looks like Q didn't have to. The belated business is a spinning Finnish red herring. Nokia has been apparently infringing for years. If it doesn't get a license from Q, it might be found to have infringed for years on all modes it sells. OK, maybe not on the cans and string spectrum free mode. If it is found to have done it knowingly, the damages will be trebled. Shoot, bro', you and I might end up with the keys to the Nokia executive crapper. OK, OK, Q probably needs some GSM IPR........but who's yo' daddy at the end of the day? Has Q ever told you a big whopping lie like the Finns do every day?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next