SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: siwash who wrote (10886)8/17/2006 7:20:09 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella  Read Replies (2) of 11603
 
Hi siwash, I wouldn’t depend on MXAM for my children’s education.

IMO only Hewlett has benefited from MXAM. He won while we all lost. The biggest mistake Maxam ever made was to tie their success to his star. Other Maxam winners are the market makers.

We had (and may still have) property that allowed for mining gold by any standard, 0.045-0.06 OPT. It could never be shown to be economic for funding, why? There were then a number of Maxam diworsifications, bottled water and more worthless preferred stock. Selling stock in foreign markets was another distraction. Even your father pulled out the rug from MXAM by selling stock for the cheap price of $0.10 just when the stock was appreciating with a good story.

IMO the flyash may offer a future, but there’s real money potential there that can find funding for larger companies with hundreds of researchers willing to hack away at the issue. What makes you think that Maxam will be successful with flyash? Maxam talks about recovery of flyash aluminum. There’s little volume value with aluminum. Scandium is the potential, but we hear nothing about its recovery.

No, take a loan for collage expenses and have the comfort knowing that your children will end up smarter than us that own MXAM stock.

IMO the only chance for MXAM stock is if they dump Hewlett and refocus back to leach mining gold at their properties again.

Regards,
Richard
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext