SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David Howe who wrote (13908)8/21/2006 12:47:59 AM
From: Orcastraiter  Read Replies (1) of 20039
 
I don't know if any of it is faked. I posted it because it did a good job of debunking the conspiracy theory. Did you read my post?

But it still doesn't answer some big questions,

1. Why are none of the hijacker's names on any of the passenger lists?

2. Why was NORAD running war games on hijacked airplanes as weapons on the very day that it happened?

3. Why did Cheney not order the plane which was heading for Washington shot down? This was after the twin towers were both hit.

4.Why did the administration say they never could have guessed that airplanes would be used as weapons to the 9-11 commission?

Also I posted those videos of the Pentagon being hit. In the second one, you can see most of the fuselage of what ever hit the Pentagon. It would be a simple matter for a photographic expert to measure the diameter of the fuselage and determine if it was the right size for the distance it was away. I've yet to see any photographic analysis posted. The distance between the camera and the flight path would need to be known and the characteristics of the camera lens...QED. Maybe you could get on that one? That would cinch it for sure.

That article has pictures of airplane parts outside the Pentagon and it has statements from people that saw the plane approach. Are these all faked?

I don't think they were faked. But remember the object that hit the Pentagon was traveling very low (it supposedly hit the heliport)and very fast, 500 mph. That would make any visual ID of it very difficult. If the news said it was a 757, a person that saw it would also say it probably looked like a plane too. Parts? How hard would that be to fake?

I think that there are many unanswered questions about what happened that day.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News