David, Please help me understand this sequence of events: You posted your message #2450 at 1:30 p.m EST about the two e-mail messages you sent to Mr. Norris on 9/12 and 9/15. In short, Mr. Norris had answered your 9/12 e-mail message, which was part of your post, but up to that time had not answered your 9/15 e-mail.
At 2:36 p.m., you posted (#2451) the reply from Mr. Norris which you stated that you had just received. Irrespective of the content of Mr. Norris' message, does it not seem a little too coincidental that he waited to respond nine days, and I may add, within a half hour of your post #2450 on this thread. He would have had to read your post #2450 and responded immediately, because of the conference call at 2:00 p.m. EST.
If I understand your post correctly, it proves management is not only watching, but watching with interest. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks so much again for your posts.
Up, Up, & Away!
Scott |
