SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Polite Political Discussion- is it Possible? An Experiment.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (1069)8/21/2006 12:55:37 PM
From: Brumar89Read Replies (1) of 1695
 
Speaking of the no-fault divorce law changes you mentioned earlier, I don't recall the public debate over that issue so it may have been before a time I remember. Do you know if the advocates of no-fault divorce, irregardless of the effect on children, were social conservatives or social liberals?

I think I know the answer. But the obvious answer invites the question, why should our society take more bad family policy advice from the same parties? Do we really want our whole society to be completely "Jerry Springer-ized"?

I'm sure at least some social liberals now recognize the negative effect of divorce on children which comes from having a mother and father seperated in different households.

Since the LGBT rights movement's Beyond Gay Marriage public proclamation calls for this explicitly - "queer couples who decide to jointly create and raise a child with another queer person or couple, in two households" - one would think people who recognize the ill effect of divorce on children would, at the least, not favor a similar negative situtation being imposed on a new set of children - this time by design before the child is even conceived!

weeklystandard.com
firstthings.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext