You're a sensitive flower when it comes to seeing your own self-serving nonsense, aren't you?
"The imitation was for the stock price, and at the time that court motion against USXP did not exist so how could my comment be taken in that context."
investorshub.com
At the time of that inopportune comment, on 28 Feb 2006, the SEC had long before filed 115 charges against USXP, Altomare et als.
So my recommendation is that you bury the hatchet and let's get on with the PLNI imitation of USXP.
ragingbull.lycos.com.
Litigation Release No. 18636 / March 24, 2004
SEC v. Universal Express, Inc., Richard A. Altomare, Chris G. Gunderson, Mark S. Neuhaus, George J. Sandhu, Spiga Limited, Tarun Mendiratta, 04 CV 02322, (GEL) (S.D.N.Y.)
sec.gov
Message 22735109 |
