SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Dierks who wrote (11221)8/22/2006 1:27:14 PM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Peter, I agree. There could be a lot more off shore drilling. One major issue in Florida, is that the string of recent Governors, have set the distance from shore that rigs could be situated. Now, I think if is 250 miles, which is a bit ridiculous to me. I wonder what they are going to do about Castro doing it so close. The fear here, is that the tourist trade would be hurt by off shore rigs, and that is a major factor in this state. Frankly, there are too many tourists roaming around the state, and getting in the way of the citizens. The dilemma is, that without tourists, our taxes would go a lot higher. So, the question is, do we want to pay more taxes for more oil.

Actually, I would rather see an alternative fuel, and fewer tourists at the same time, but that ain't gonna to be easy.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext