Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: michael97123 who wrote (198537)	8/22/2006 3:50:47 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Hell, what the hell is NK but the most terrorist regime in the history of man and we need to settle with them too. Uh.. why do WE need to settle with them? It would seem to me that Seoul and Pyongyang need to settle their differences. Our only purpose in being involved in the first place is because we are currently the guarantors of S. Korea's security against NK aggression. As far as I'm concerned, the nations in that region, to include China, need to step forward and take more of an initiative in dealing with NK. Personally, I have no desire to overthrow the "Dear Son" since NK doesn't border our country and economically speaking, I don't see NK posing a threat to the global economy (not in the manner as the oil-laden Middle East does). I certainly do not believe we should "personalize" the situation by making it a bi-lateral negotiation. But in the case of Iran and Syria, we're seeing them export their aggression throughout the region and I see Islamic militancy as a far greater threat than some re-emergence of Stalinist-style communism. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next