SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: puborectalis who wrote (75802)8/23/2006 10:44:32 AM
From: JeffA  Read Replies (2) of 173976
 
The big bang supports elemental development at a much lower level than carbon. It is in the baryon range until deuterium was formed.

The cause of why protons and neutrons came to be together is not explainable, the addition of an electron is, if you can get by not explaining the proton and neutron. How gravitational forces came to be and made matter attract and clump together is not explainable, another theory.

So, using the aforementioned "facts," in cosomological terms, carbon would be quite old and totally incapable of indicating how the universe formed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News