SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 421.32-0.5%Jan 16 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: foundation who wrote (8509)8/23/2006 12:57:17 PM
From: RJA_  Read Replies (2) of 219423
 
>>... if this were an abstract game of chess, whose color would you choose -- the US or Iran?

Bush knows his position will only weaken over time.

The analogy is the British/French in 1933 - 34 -35. Hitler could have been stopped easily at that time, perhaps without bloodshed.

At this time (1 - 2 yr window) Iran can be stopped -- at great cost -- but it can be stopped. IMHO it would require nukes. Perhaps more than one.

At great cost:

1. Would make US pariah.
2. Would totally destroy US$
3. Could create lots of pissed off folks down wind.

But would effectively remove bomb from Iranian religious wacko set.

Only question: Does bush have power and inclination to do this?

I think he has the inclination.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext