SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (27082)8/24/2006 9:09:39 AM
From: mph  Read Replies (3) of 541477
 
You're more willing to accept excuses than I am.
From the parents.
From the educational system.

I know it's more convenient to expect government at large to
pick up the slack.

But the state already picks up slack in the area of regulating what appears on the airwaves. Ironically, when the FCC acts, or is perceived to have overreacted, free speech advocates bellow.

If you want to believe that editing old cartoons actually accomplishes something, by all means do so. That's where this topic began. I regard such editing as an idle gesture.

As a practical matter, if parents do not act to shield their children, they will not be shielded. The injurious influences and images are just too pervasive in a free society, particularly one in which rap artists who spout filthy lyrics are lionized by teens. The degradation of women in such music is particularly disturbing to me.

_________________________

btw, if HS seniors weren't read nursery rhymes, that would
mean that the lack of bedtime reading occurred during the Clinton era. I thought the conventional Dem position was that the Clinton era was an economic Camelot. If so, how come parents had to work so hard then?<g>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext