Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 152.64

-0.3%

2:56 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: rkral who wrote (144525)	8/25/2006 1:25:16 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) of 152472

BTW in which ITC filing did you find that datapoint? Since I was looking at a copy saved on my hard drive, I tried to get away with being lazy <g>. It was from the file that Carranza originally linked. edisweb.usitc.gov but I think Qualcomm was still obligated to declare Essential IPR to ETSI ... in a "timely fashion" after becoming aware of such IPR. Assuming that Nokia is actually infringing, that is going to be the heart of the matter. I'm never going to believe that Qualcomm didnt know what was going into the various standards so really it comes down to a question of what their obligations were. Slacker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next