Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 148.83

+1.1%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (144601)	8/28/2006 1:17:20 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) of 152472

+ the Q agreed not to hold the 2001 extension up on the matter of consideration for standalone GSM products and as such “unofficially” gave NOK a non royalty bearing right to sell such w/o specific mention in the agreement. I really doubt that this is how it played out. According to Nokia (and there should be records if this isnt the case), Qualcomm never brought up GSM licensing prior to the '01 agreement. edisweb.usitc.gov Yet, as of 2001, Qualcomm had never claimed to hold patents reading on GSM products (Nokia's or otherwise) nor had it (to Nokia's knowledge) claimed the licensing of any GSM patents to anyone, ever. Slacker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next