SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sylvester80 who wrote (199945)8/28/2006 7:03:38 PM
From: Ichy Smith  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Well that is your opinion, and mine is different. I think Clinton was a bad president because he made bad decisions and brought the Presidentcy into disrepute. I think he did a reasonable job other than that. I think Bush is a so so president who had the misfortune to live in interesting times. I think Carter would have been far worse, and I think because he listened to people that Reagan might have been better. So far I have seen no one on the horizon who looks like a great President except maybe the guy who played the president whose plane got hijacked, or Maybe Jack Nicholson, who would look fine, say his lines with great distinction, and not bother to think about it too much. I still think it is time to look at getting some professionals to advise every president, regardless of party, who are not obligated for their jobs to a slush fund. I also think the handover should be within a week.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News