SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alan Smithee who wrote (177685)8/29/2006 11:17:06 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (4) of 793846
 
Neither of the Wal-Marts that I have visited sells groceries so I have no frame of reference on that. I do know, though, from having owned shares of grocery chains, that the profit margin on grocery items is tiny. A Wal-Mart large enough for a grocery might have enough reductions in cost both in employees and volume buying from the lowest cost sellers to sell for significantly less, but 25% reduction on products that have a typical profit margin of 3% seems a stretch, intuitively.

As we have already seen, the $2300 figure was based on food items. The Wal-Mart ad did not make that distinction. I had in mind hair dryers, pens, batteries, and bath towels, not Rice Crispies.

The two Wal-Marts that I have shopped (Tucson AZ and Manassas VA) are filled with Mexicans and geezers, none of whom look like they have enough resources to spend $2300 a year, let alone save that much. I know that the family members with whom I've shopped there don't have that kind of spending money. Not even close. Perhaps there's a lot of variation in clientele from store to store.

(I have almost no need to buy "stuff" but just recently purchased a hand electric mixer for nine bucks at Target. I was stunned. It wasn't even a special, just a regular price. At that price you can practically use it once and throw it away. Wonder how much less it might have been at Wal-Mart. <g>)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext