Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 137.31

+0.7%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Clarksterh who wrote (144647)	8/29/2006 12:27:48 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) of 152472

Do you have a pointer to an actual Q declaration to ETSI for GSM? I'm not sure exactly what you are looking for, but here is a direct link to some of the patents that Qualcomm has declared essential for GSM. The notation about abiding by the ETSI IPR policy is listed on all of the declared patents. tinyurl.com There is something odd about this. Why would they FRAND for a standard where ETSI has no leverage over Q? Was it in relation only to their use with UMTS? That is a good question. I dont know what the upside would be unless they were required to do so, and if that is the case, we get back to the issue of timing. FWIW, I just did a search for Qualcomm and GERAN on the ETSI site....it looks like Qualcomm has a made a few contributions over the years. tinyurl.com Slacker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next