Matritech (NASDAQ - NMPS) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Matritech (NASDAQ - NMPS)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mark Mueller who wrote (194)	8/17/1996 1:13:00 PM
From: Patrick Tang	of 849

Mark: You are right in your observations. Low volume in the down days means no selling by serious long-term investors. The supply of stocks is limited (as long as these fools refrain from PPO) while demand creeps up. These market makers are running out of time, and I firmly believe that better days are ahead. In addition, Clinton is right on schedule for the land-slide victory. Maybe I should go to Mexico and place my bet on him. Betting 8 to make 1 is VERY attractive. Mark, be careful with the pink-sheet stuff. Try to diversify if you can. Nothing is a sure-shot except tax, death and year 2000. Best wishes from a mad monk. P.S. I received your E-Mail for CECN, thank you, and it has pretty decent prospect. However, since I am a tea leaf reader and this thing does not provide me enough caffeine (price/volume data) to chew on, my opinion is neutral at this time. I repeat: the year 2000 problem is for REAL. I was a superstar programmer in the Information Service Department of the Pacific Stock Exchange and had experienced hands-on know-how in large scale conversion such as the stock cusip numbers. The y-2000 related stocks are SURE-SHOTs, despite what the Fortune article said.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next