Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elroy who wrote (200167)	8/30/2006 12:12:12 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) of 281500

What a curious problem. A one-state solution says that, in a few years, non-Jews will outnumber Jews and Israel as a Jewish state will disappear. So the basic argument is one of ethnic and religious purity in what is quite a secular country otherwise. So here are the Israeli Jews arguing for separation while maintaining that they are the civilized and democratic ones in the area. South Africa's caucasian population was treated like dirt in the international community for this attitude yet it's considered the 'moral' side of the argument in this situation. What a curious thing. Now Pat Buchanan is arguing that Mexico wants to take over 7 southwestern states and, I guess, wants to build walls in order to preserve the whiteness of the US of A which is set to become all kinds of shades of beige in about 50 years or less. Is preserving the whiteness or the relative short history of european culture in the US a moral issue? Are those who back Israel's quest to stay Jewish also backing Pat's quest to keep the USA European and South Africa's quest to stay white as well? What are the rules exactly?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next