SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (50612)8/31/2006 4:57:43 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 90947
 
Neither " Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" nor "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States" really amount to "separation of church and state". The part about religious tests is highly specific. The part about establishment is a slightly more complex issue, but certainly religious ideas can have quite a role in politics without any establishment of religion. If Harris limited her statements to pointing that out, there wouldn't be a good reason to disagree with her. But when she says things like "If you're not electing Christians, then in essence you are going to legislate sin", she deserves a lot of criticism. Not that people only voting for Christians violates either of the constitutionally standards you quoted (people are and should be free to vote for anyone who is legally eligible), but such a comment shows at least a degree of intolerance to non-Christians, and voting strictly based on religious sect is an idea that will generally have negative results if it becomes the norm. If politics becomes a matter of religion than the country can truly be torn apart. We should vote as Americans, not as partisan supporters of a particular religion or ethnic group.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext