Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.18

+1.1%

Dec 18 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (54896)	9/1/2006 12:01:34 PM
From: JGoren	Read Replies (2) of 196989

Wrong standard of proof? "Fraud typically has to be proven by clear and convincing evidence, a legal standard which is a close relative of the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used in criminal law." Unless you're talking about some strange federal standard, the burden of proof is generally "preponderance of the evidence." "Clear and convincing" standard is not that close to "beyond a reasonable doubt"; it's in the middle. Just posting so folks not mislead, because I am not sure you're right.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next