SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 172.52-2.0%3:29 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: carranza2 who wrote (54899)9/1/2006 8:18:43 PM
From: lml  Read Replies (1) of 196977
 
Fraud and a few other things are judged more strictly using the "clear and convincing evidence" standard, a standard which is difficult to articulate but IMO opinion is closer to the very strict "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used to convict in criminal cases than to the "preponderance of the evidence" standard.

I usually rate "clear & convincing" above 2/3rds or 63%, & "beyond reasonable" @ least 95%. My rationale is if you have 12 jurors in a criminal trial, & you represent the prosecution, during voir dire, you wanna avoid the 5 out of 100 that you think will have "reasonable doubt" in your case. Whether you win is really luck of the draw . . . but your best with consultants & voir dire to improve your odds.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News