Boxing: The Sweet Science Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Boxing: The Sweet Science

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LPS5 who wrote (10329)	9/3/2006 12:15:44 PM
From: Bwe	Read Replies (1) of 10489

e, I thought it was a very good fight. Think about what could have been if both were in top shape. I had Toney winning the fight by two rounds -- three with the point deduction. Peter did better than I expected and he was able to land flush on Toney quite a few times. Peter even found Toney with the jab a few times so I'll have to take issue with Toney that he took everything away from Peter. Toney's jab was superb and his combination punching is terrific for a heavyweight in today's day and age. I particularly missed CompuBox in this fight. I know that Toney made Peter miss an awful lot and I would have liked to see how many punches a round each fighter was throwing. I think the judges incorrectly rewarded Peter for ineffective aggression in this fight as Toney controlled the geography of the fight and I think he far out-landed the Nigerian Nightmare. The consequences of the fight are good for all concerned. Peter has come through the fire of Klitschko and Toney and is proving to be a viable contender with a future. Toney acquitted himself well and is still in the mix as a top ten heavyweight although time is running out. Bruce

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next