SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: steve harris who wrote (14450)9/3/2006 11:32:09 PM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (1) of 20039
 
LOL...you have NO answer for the facts that physics provides.
The facts are not a conspiracy. They are facts. And, unsurprisingly, you are quite stupid to think this exchange is about any kind of conspiracy.
It's a fact that "A" is the first letter in the English alphabet. Do you also think this fact is a conspiracy theory?

Now...since there are NO conspiracy theories involved with facts...AND you have already said you would address the following but you have yet to do so...AND now that your fears of a conspiracy theory can be set aside...AND since Popular Mechanics (LOL!!!) has also not addressed the following in their straw man circus of an article that took on nothing of importance as related to the facts...step right up to the plate stevie...

WHAT accounts for the FACT of freefall of the buildings?
Building 7,in FACT, fell at the speed of freefall in a vaccuum.
What created the vaccuum?
WHAT accounts for the FACT of the release of energy during the collapses that reduced not only the concrete to an average of 30 micron-sized dust particles but most of the buildings' contents as well AND the subsequent pyroclastic flows being many multiples of the energy that was available due to a gravitational collapse?

Hint...Explosive devices is the only answer.

So...
A.) Explosive devices
B.) You have no rational explanation
C.) You choose to ignore the question because answering A or B is not within your purview.

Here are the FACTS you have to explain for just one tower:
All units in KwH
135,000 required for crushing of concrete (9e10 g to 60 micron powder)
ignoring water vaporization
400,000 for heating of gasses (2e9 g air from 300 to 1020 K)
11,300,000 for heating of suspended concrete (9e10 g from 300 to 1020 K)
assuming water vaporization sink was not supply-limited
1,496,000 for vaporization of water (2.38e9 g water)
41,000 for heating of gasses (2e9 g air from 300 to 373 K)
1,145,000 for heating of suspended concrete (9e10 g from 300 to 373 K)

Here is the amount of energy in KwH available from gravity collapse:
111,000 falling of mass (1.97e11 g falling average of 207 m)

911review.com

Tear into it. There's only a disparity of 14.4 million Kwh. Should be easy to explain to us all where 14.4 million KwH came from...right?

Explaining the vaccuum and the freefall speeds should be a breeze once you find the source for 14.4 million KwH.

video.google.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext