SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Dierks who wrote (11633)9/5/2006 11:06:51 AM
From: E. T.  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
"That would allow people who are opposed to freedom to make new claims of our failures in Iraq."

That statement is just a propaganda prop and is utterly meaningless. Iraq is spiralling toward a civil war and the responsibility for that lies with the president. He failed as a leader for choosing to take the advice of people with no war experience. He chose instead to take the advice of people connected with those make and sell armaments and who provide services to the military. He chose not to take the advice of military people who have actually bloodied their hands in war.

No one hear is opposed to freedom. But let's call a spade a spade. The president doesn't know, never did know, what he was doing in Iraq. How could he, if he listens to Rumsfeld and Cheney and passes on the advice of Powell and others.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News