SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: cirrus who wrote (36)9/5/2006 5:14:26 PM
From: Jim S  Read Replies (2) of 10087
 
"Every time someone tells me that social security should be privatized I tell them to ask former Enron employees how their private plan fared."

Point well taken, cirrus. And, according to the news today, Delta Airlines' pilots may be in a similar condition.

But I don't think that's a fair comparison -- privatization of SS wouldn't be controlled by a corporate entity, it would be controlled by individuals. A more apt comparison would be to the current SS system going broke some time in the future, just as Enron did and Delta is doing now. If people have money in their OWN accounts, controlled by themselves, similar to our IRAs now, that wouldn't happen.

I'd much prefer to have my SS in an account that I own and control. If that account collapses because of my own management, it will be MY fault, not some amorphous corporate (or government) agency.

I see two reasons that many don't like the idea of privatization of SS: One, some may be better investors than others, and that wouldn't be "fair" to those too lazy to learn to manage their money. And Two, it takes a lot of power away from those who want to use the SS network as their own private slush fund.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext