SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (14989)9/6/2006 11:17:07 PM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (3) of 20039
 
No...not true. WTC7 was bottom up. The towers were top down.
1. Both fell MUCH faster than a gravity-alone collapse can possibly account for.
2. The concrete in all 3 was reduced to particles averaging 30 microns in size.
The mass of the towers at the heights from which they fell did not possess sufficient potential energy to produce that effect.
3. There was also not enough potential energy available to produce the observed pyroclastic flows.

Gravity-alone collapse theories completely fail on multiple, simultaneous factors.

Only a complete moron would fail to comprehend this.
Ergo, you are necessarily a complete moron.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News