Fastcomm FSCX (6 1/8), base now complete. Big Upside. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Fastcomm FSCX (6 1/8), base now complete. Big Upside.

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Michael Patrick who wrote (216)	9/25/1997 3:36:00 PM
From: nick cash	of 802

michael, i have no interest in getting into a pissing contest with you; i don't have the time nor the inclination. that being said-don't get smart with me. you posted: <Hello Rick & other FSCX watchers, Pete told me that an announcement(s) would be released just a few days after earnings...over a week has passed...any insight into this announcement which is "MIA"?> then 2 lines later posted: <Southwestern Bell Communications and ICI contracts: There may be truth to these rumors.> your next post you said: <Pete said today that an announcement was coming soon, very soon. So, perhaps within this week or so there will be something to move the stock back into the $6's going into the October 8th show which may generate further business.> you knew damn well what you were implying and, to be honest, i question your tact. if in fact madsen told you announcement(s) were imminent and connected that statement to anything specific he should have his head examined. others may not know how things work but i manage $ for a living and do. companies NEVER reveal the name of the potential client. additionally, if management slips in a private conversation with me i sure as hell would never attribute this info to a specific individual by name in a public forum. please. go ahead and give madsen the url and see what he thinks of the comment. i guarantee you that if what you implied is true that you will never hear anything that isn't in a press release out of his mouth again. if you are a "fundmgr" as your email address suggests you would know all of this to be common sense and would have never tried to legitimize your comments by using madsens name. spare the due dilligence lecture, i do this for a living not for a game. nobody else is calling you on it because they a)hope it's true and b) think they've found a source of information that they don't have access to. i call 'em like i see 'em and i know anyone close enough to get info like you implied knows enough not to post the source on si. 10 minutes wasted on this is enough. all imo of course....nick

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next