SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 421.32-0.5%Jan 16 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rolla Coasta who wrote (9137)9/10/2006 12:17:16 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 219431
 
<Frankly, it would be churlish of the civilized world to deny martyrdom to those who seem so intent on its pursuance. >

Good point.

There need not be a lot of fallout. As per Jules Feiffer [I'm sure it was him] in the 1960s, they have "bombs which can blow up everything, and they are 100% clean" = making fun of the militaristic mania whereby [he suggested the military thinks] blowing everything up is fine, as long as there's no radioactive fallout.

The USA or NATO or whoever, could do an aerial small neutron fission explosion, which would not cause a lot of radioactivity downwind, or a lot of physical destruction [such as smashing containment facilities for the Iran noocular projects], but would kill the people involved in those facilities. Unless they wore tin hats and lead underwear or carried lead [or boron] umbrellas.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News