Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ichy Smith who wrote (202389)	9/10/2006 12:17:52 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) of 281500

But the UN has brokered a peace with Lebanon and israel in which Lebanon had no intention of keeping even one of the articles agreed upon. The US and France wrote the resolution....didn't Bush say something about it not supporting the "status quo" and would result in "lasting peace"? If Iran has the nuclear weapons, and israel destroys Iran, I see a need to bind the UN so that it's definite proislamic stance doesn't make things worse. Iran and Israel have a nuclear exchange wiping both countries off the map and you're concerned about the alleged pro-Islamic stance of the UN making it worse? ROTFLOL. jttmab

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next