SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About the Wars (moderated)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kumar who wrote (313)9/11/2006 1:28:34 AM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) of 441
 
Yes. But Mr. Gandhi was a gentleman. And proved it. And died for it, too.

A hypothetical question: Suppose Hitler, instead of making his idiotic wasteful attack on the USSR, instead had continued his attack through Balkans, taken Greece, Turkey, swung south through Palestine, through the intervening countries into Afghanistan, then taken India. And Gandhi had tried his nonviolent approach against the Wehrmacht. What would have happened?

I suspect they would have murdered him into cold blood.

The difference was Gandhi was dealing with the British, who are much more loath to engage in such tactics. Rather than have a bloodbath to keep India, they gave it independence, which it has used well.

(And, yes I know of one occasion on which the British did open fire on unarmed civilians.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext