That's an Iranian new paper. What would you expect?
What are you implying? That it is dishonest or what? Please elaborate.
You have to understand that ever since the Zionists have succeeded in consecrating the Holocaust as a Sacred Cow (no doubt to help in the realization of their of their political
agenda) they have enacted that any mention or discussion of the Holocaust is an indictable offence. Routinely they have charged offenders with Anti-Semitism and, more often than not, jailed them or destroyed their reputations and/or their careers. Just last year the Knesset has passed a law enabling the Zionists in Israel to charge Holocaust minimalizers/deniers/critics in absentia. Against this backdrop, is it ever possible to find current debates and criticisms of the Holocaust in the west? Are you up to snuff on this topic? Or have you faithfully and dutifully swallowed it all hook, line and sinker?
Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, is brave enough and within his rights to voice his opinion that the Holocaust is a myth. I do not speak for him. Nor do I know what is in his mind. But when people claim that the Holocaust is a myth, they generally do not mean it never occurred. Rather they question the veracity of the 6-million number of Jews that died in the concentration camps and in the gas chambers.
My interest in the Holocaust was sparked by the Zionists' insistence that it is to be accepted by one and all as the absolute truth, a Dogma as it were, and that it is a taboo to doubt, discuss or criticize it and that offenders will be subjected to punishment.
Surely, if the Holocaust is indeed true, it should be able to bear the scrutiny of daylight and its veracity will be strengthened with each examination. But since scrutiny is forbidden, I am questioning it.
By the way, there is an old Indian (Tamil) saying: "Even if you let off a fart under the water (presumably a really stinky one to hide the fact) others can still see the evidence (of the fart) in the bubbles.
If the Holocaust is true, it will be upheld. To my mind, forcing people to accept something that is questionable on pain of imprisonment and loss of one's reputation and/or career, makes it utterly suspect.
. |
