SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 215.11+0.1%Dec 24 12:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rink who wrote (210806)9/13/2006 11:23:47 AM
From: brushwudRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
I said that 65nm will feature huge power savings per transistor because quad core Opteron will have more than twice the amount of transistors compared to current dual cores will fit in more or less the same power envellope.

I agree that quad-core Opteron will have twice as many transistors and fit into roughly the same power envelope, although it isn't clear that it will match the frequency of the top dual-core. But you didn't answer my question about whether the initial 65 nm parts would go into the mobile market rather than desktops. Now you seem to be implying that servers would benefit most.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News