Observations and Collectables Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Observations and Collectables

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (269)	9/13/2006 7:04:23 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) of 17073

I'll comment on only one of the links now due to time: millerandlevine.com Claiming the flagellar motor developed from another structure, the type 3 secretory system, doesn't address the issue of irreducible complexity IMO. It is a surmise that the flagellar motor developed from the TTSS. It could just as easily be surmised (and has been) that the TTSS developed from the flagellar motor. It might be that neither developed from the other. But either way, both are arguably irreducibly complex, so what is gained by arguing one is derived from the other. You are still left with an irreducibly complex structure. Also, I'll add that Miller seems to want to have it both ways. Biological life just happened without design per mainstream Darwinism, yet he agrees that we're in a world of meaning and purpose consistent with an overarching, possibly Divine intelligence... Life is either one or the other - accident or design. Of the two, design is far easier to believe.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next