SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 210.80-4.8%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ChrisBBo who wrote (210913)9/15/2006 6:06:12 AM
From: DDB_WORead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Regarding AMD's 65nm process -
did you already have a look at the following comparison of 65nm prototype vs. 90nm core at nearly correct scale (based on DDR pads, but size is in the ballpark of the size measured on 300mm wafer):
img132.imageshack.us

The whole core doesn't scale so much, but the individual units, SRAMs etc. do. E.g. the integer unit width or FP reg file width are reduced to ~70% or even somewhat less.

There was already a discussion here:
aceshardware.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext