Canadian Rocket Red's Picks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Rocket Red's Picks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Land Shark who wrote (8757)	9/16/2006 7:57:14 PM
From: teevee	Read Replies (1) of 19697

""Maybe somebody's trying to shake a few shares by raising a moot point? I didn't read any references to an underground river in ARU's website. Kindly point out where it is. The porous sandstone cover is 20-50 m thick. The mineralization starts at 300 m. I don't think there'd be any problems with aquifers. The Silitoe report also mentions no water-related mining issues."" yields, The river flows on the surface, the sandstone and conglomerate is porous, and Silitoe's report deals explicitly with geology, not with mining engineering issues. Neither is Silitoe's report 43-101 compliant as stated by ARU (strictly for promotional purposes). I don't own any ARU and I don't have an axe to grind. I was only noting observations that WILL impact the feasibility study on the mineralization outlined.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next