Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bilow who wrote (203226)	9/17/2006 1:16:49 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) of 281500

The video and photographic evidence as well as eywitnesses all trend toward maybe 5% of the concrete was larger chunks. The dust was inches deep throughout a widespread area. Massive clouds of dust made it out over the river as well. Find me ONE...just ONE photograph of large chunks of concrete. If you like, I'll show you dozens of panoramic videos and photos showing no chunks or slabs. I was being extremely generous with 20%. And even 5% is generous. The towers did not contain nearly enough potential energy to do that even if 1/2 the concrete remained whole. Structural engineers worked with the physicists. Go to st911.org Over 200 academicians, engineers, aviation specialists, military specialists, etc...have been doing the work the bush/cheney cover-up specialists did not. Do you not realize the real work is being done by fully qualified people...worldwide? The truth is coming... Now...the seismic evidence. Or can't you handle the proof?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next